|
o |
|
CARACAS, Venezuela
(By
Chris Kraul, LATimes) December 3, 2007
— Voters on Sunday
defeated a package of constitutional reforms that could
have indefinitely extended President Hugo Chavez's grip
on power here. It was a shocking electoral loss for the
strongman, his first in nine years at the helm.
Voters defeated two ballot measures that would have
changed 69 articles in Venezuela's Constitution, which
was rewritten in 1999, the year Chavez took office.
Margins were tight on both, with the "no" votes edging
the "yes" votes by 50.7% to 49.3% and 51% to 49%.
At a news conference after the National Electoral
Council's release of its official bulletin that declared
the results to be "irreversible" at 1:20 a.m. local
time, Chavez exhorted his supporters, "Don't feel sad or
weighed down. . . . This was a microscopic difference
but with the 'no's' on top.
"I congratulate my opponents for their victory. To use a
phrase from February 1992, we've fallen short for now,"
a reference to Chavez's admission of defeat after his
abortive coup attempt that ended in his imprisonment but
that launched his political career.
Some analysts predicted before the results were released
— nine tense hours after balloting ended — that the
loss, in destroying Chavez's mantle of invincibility,
would embolden his domestic opponents. What seems
certain is that the defeat will energize the opposition,
especially student groups that took to the street to
oppose the reforms.
"We'll continue in the struggle to build socialism
within the framework of this constitution," Chavez said,
holding aloft a booklet containing the 1999
constitution.
Chavez said he could have prolonged the tension by
demanding continued scrutiny of the votes, but decided
to concede defeat to spare the nation possible conflict.
"Those of you who were nervous I wouldn't recognize the
results, you can go home quietly and celebrate."
Voter turnout was a low 55%, a level analysts thought
would never carry opponents to victory.
The vote was closer than any of Chavez's seven previous
nationwide votes dating back to his election to office
in December 1998, all of which he won handily. Chavez
framed the reforms as critical to deepening his
socialist Bolivarian Revolution, which has channeled
billions of oil dollars to social outreach programs for
free education, healthcare and discount groceries for
the poor.
But even Venezuelans living below the poverty line —
the bedrock of Chavez's power base — have grown
increasingly skeptical about the reforms and
disenchanted with Chavez, pollsters said. Ill feeling
was being driven by higher prices and scarcities of
basic foods, including milk, chicken and beans. Last
week, people waited three hours in lines to purchase
staples at some government-run Mercal grocery stores.
"The hard Chavez vote has always been a utilitarian
vote," said Jose Antonio Gil Yepes, president of the
polling firm Datanalisis. "Although they still feel a
personal loyalty to Chavez, those poor voters who always
got something from Chavez are getting less."
Slayings and other crimes have skyrocketed and housing
programs have fallen short of Chavez's grandiose
promises. But voters in poor Caracas barrios said their
loyalty to Chavez was unswerving.
"I voted for him," said Freddy Mijares, 32, a bakery
employee, after casting a ballot in Plaza Lazaro
Cardenas in central Caracas. "For the changes that we
have seen and those that are coming."
Mechanic Enrique Casana, who voted in favor of the
reforms at a polling place near the barrio where Chavez
cast his ballot, said the president deserved support
because "people who before had nothing now have
something. . . . The scarcities aren't his fault. It's
that of people who are hoarding things."
The most controversial element of the reforms would have
extended presidential terms to seven from six years and
allowed the president to run for reelection
indefinitely.
Currently, the president can be reelected only once.
Chavez raised the prospect of perpetual power in a
closing campaign speech Friday to tens of thousands of
red-shirted supporters on Avenida Bolivar, saying he
would remain in office until 2050 or age 95 "if the
Venezuelan people ordain it."
But critics also were concerned about changes that would
have expanded the president's discretionary powers,
giving him control of billions of dollars in central
bank reserves and enabling him to create new regional
and municipal entities ruled by vice presidents whom he
would name and whose powers would take precedence over
that of elected governors and mayors.
Supporters and opponents alike were expecting Chavez to
use the reforms to push through laws strengthening the
concepts of communal property in the form of worker-run
cooperatives managed collectively by "communal
councils."
But Rafael Simon Jimenez, a historian who once was a
Chavez supporter and an assemblyman, spoke for many
critics when he described the constitutional reforms as
less an ideological document than a political one, a
plan designed to concentrate power in the president's
hands.
"Chavez is a man to whom it has never occurred to be an
ex-president of Venezuela," Jimenez said in an interview
Sunday evening.
Chavez's goal is authoritarian in nature, said Agustin
Blanco Munoz, a researcher at Central University of
Venezuela who wrote a biography based partially on
jailhouse interviews he conducted after Chavez was
imprisoned for leading the unsuccessful 1992 coup
attempt.
"His model isn't communism or socialism. It's a varnish,
a cover for a personalist system that exalts Chavez
above all else as the caudillo, the new messiah,
not the collective society," Blanco Munoz said.
Before the vote, public opinion firms Datanalisis and
Consultores 21 agreed that only a huge voter turnout
could turn the tide against Chavez. That's because
turnout in past votes has been significantly higher
among pro-Chavez voters than the opposition, meaning a
high abstention level would favor a "yes" vote.
Sunday's vote was the closest since 2004, when Chavez
successfully beat back a recall initiative to oust him
from office.
In the Friday speech and in a three-hour news conference
Saturday, Chavez made little mention of the contents of
the proposal, instead pulling on two tried and tested
campaign levers: personal loyalty and foreign threats. A
vote against the reforms would be tantamount to betrayal
of him and the Venezuelan people, he told the tens of
thousands of followers amassed on Avenida Bolivar.
To foreign reporters convened at the Miraflores
presidential palace Saturday, he said he had become
aware of a CIA plan dubbed Operation Tenaza to
assassinate him.
He said Venezuela's dignity was besmirched at the
Iberoamerican Summit last month when Spanish King Juan
Carlos I told him, "Why don't you shut up?" and that
Spanish banks and other companies could be nationalized
unless he got an apology.
"I have a file this thick of Spanish companies in
Venezuela and I am reviewing all of them," Chavez said.
In the run-up to the vote, the Venezuelan leader also
had a public spat with Colombian President Alvaro Uribe
over the latter's termination of Chavez's role in
mediating the release of prisoners held by leftist
Colombian rebels.


